|
|
team
Hydrofoil
Newsletter
The "Flight Log"
Written
by:
Brett Edlen |
Jumping Higher, A
Tutorial |
|
A trip out
to the east coast made me re-look at the way some people
are riding.... made me realize how influential those
videos that Jake K made so long ago.
The target here is "the stomp". I'm going to stick my
neck out and say that the "stomp" as we know it is old
school, and is/should be dead. There's a new kid in
town, and it's called 'loading the line'...a.k.a. the
darkside.
I've seen people using the stomp, and walked them
through going to line tension. The result, 100% of the
time is more control in the air, and cleaner, higher
jumps, which will lead to higher inverts, and also make
them 100 times easier to learn because you will have the
line to help you.
I'm going to attempt a tutorial here. I'm sure others
will pitch in, please do! I'll probably miss something
typing in this little box.
So here it is:
Jumping Higher --- a tutorial
The best way to get what I am about to tell you is to
stop jumping altogether for a minute, and focus on your
handle and line. For these first few steps, don't jump.
Concentrate on your skiing. Concentrate on the pull of
the handle. Learn the feel, learn how to lean against
the pull, learn how to use the line to generate speed
and power. The ultimate goal here is to have your line
tight so you can use it to change the angle of your foil
to point up as fast as you can. A quick change in foil
wing direction to up = higher air.
First, shorten your rope to 65', this will give you more
control on the line, and you won't have to cut as hard
in these beginning stages.
Now, position yourself just outside the wake on the
driver's side of the boat. begin with a slight pull and
work on 'progressing' the cut as you get wider and
wider. A progressive cut means you add more lean to the
cut the longer you are cutting. What this gains you is
that this puts you cutting the hardest and fastest at
the end of your cut. If you don't use a progressive cut,
your hardest and fastest is at the beginning, and you
end up expending more energy and going slower by the
time you finally jump.
Repeat this, start from just outside the wake, and do it
until you can cut under control with a progressive cut
without thinking about it. Then, take it to the other
side. Just cut.... no jumping! Feel the force of the
line, use the line to generate more and more speed on
your cuts.
Once you get these down, swing to one side, and cut all
the way through the wake to the other side. Again,
PROGRESSIVE cut. You shouldn't be cutting that hard
until your leaving the wake on the other side. By that
time, you should be near 'full on'.
Do this several times in both directions. Pay close
attention to the force the boat is pulling on the line.
This will show you the kind of line tension you will
eventually be aiming for. You will have to lean away
from the boat to counter the strong pull. Remember the
feel of the pull on the line, you will be trying to
attain that from here on out.
The next step is to go back to just outside the wake. At
this point, one side will be more comfortable than the
other. It's ok to start with this side, but important to
work on both sides. Use the progressive cut method to
cut out. Get to 55-60 degrees from the wake. This
doesn't have to be exact, but you should be more than
45.
If you do the progressive cut correctly, you should have
strong line tension at this 55 degree mark and moving
fast.
Without flattening, without turning into the boat, begin
your jump. Don't "stomp" the board, but rather make the
foil go down by pressing with your feet a little harder
than you already are. Just as the board brushes the
water, pull the handle down and in slightly (the "in"
will straighten you so you don't get pulled over once in
the air) and release the pressure on your feet. You no
longer have to pull up on your knees. It will be tough
not to flatten and let the line slacken before you jump,
but if you do that, you will defeat the purpose of this
exercise.
The first few jumps, you will get pulled in to the boat.
By this, I mean the tip of the board will begin turning
in. This is actually good, and will teach you to use
this tight line. IF the board turns in, you counter it
by moving the handle in the same direction as the tip.
Moving the handle in with a tight line will move the tip
back out, and you will land straight and ski away
nicely.
Remember, jump with the loaded line. You will see that
it doesn't take any work at all to get the foil out of
the water. The stomp wastes a lot of energy on you, and
the momentum when the board hits the water. A loaded
line is your friend. Do this cut/jump over and over
until you feel the difference in your jumps. You may/may
not notice height immediately, but you will notice that
they feel different... better... more in control.
After you have gotten the air jumps down, cut at the
wake. Have the line loaded at least as much as it just
was on your air jumps, and jump at the wake. This will
teach you how to load the line for those big air rolls,
and how to time the wake.
I've seen this work, over and over. At first, it will be
scary, and you will want to flatten out before you jump.
When you first jump with a loaded line, you'll know it.
You'll also probably crash. Don't slow the boat down,
stay at your normal speed. Learn it like you ski it. The
crashing will stop soon enough. Remember to move your
handle to straighten you back out.
Take it big. We all have the potential for 60 frames.
Unleash it. |
|
|
Written
by:
Jake Bradley
|
The wingletLESS Revolution |
|
The date is early
spring of the year 2006, the country is Australia.
While brainstorming on possible way to make a foil ride
better, a concept was brought back into the hydrofoil
scene, calling into question the meaning of today’s wing
designs. To me, it’s sort of a grey area when
discussing the functionality of winglets. Many will say
that they are used to create a sort of traction for the
wing to set into while cutting or banking. Others will
say that they are used to trap water between them,
creating a sort of explosion of water, launching the
rider harder out of the water, or something like that…
Then you hear from different people that winglets serve
none of these purposes and are only used today because
some foiling technology hasn’t changed in a number of
years. Are any of these people wrong? That’s hard to
say. Are any of these people qualified to make these
statements? Well… |
|

|
|
During the period
of testing this wingletless wing in Australia, a lot of
good feedback surfaced about the numerous
characteristics it had. From the pictures that we saw,
it looked like it didn’t affect the ride too much, but
who knows, anyone can make pictures look good. After
weeks of hearing about this new design, I knew I had to
get in on the action. I wondered if anyone in the
States had messed with this sort of ‘retro’ design on
their foils. After calling Sky Ski and finding out they
had a couple of them shelved, thankfully they sent me
B-Flat Wing and Bat Wing, both without their winglets
bent.
Something everyone should know about the rider Darth
Bradley is that he knows pretty much the good, bad, and
ugly about a foil setup just about right off the bat, if
not before he gets on it. Excuse the third person
talkage, but I felt it sounded better that way. So
anyways, after receiving the two test wings, we headed
out to see what the jive was all about with the
wingletless technology. Now me and my fellow tester
have been riding different setups for about the last six
months. He came off a composite foil setup right to
mine, so he had to overcome that difference, as well as
the difference in wings. | So here we go, testing this
new wing set up with a lot of assumptions on our minds.
I was the first one out on the B-Flat wingletless to
test against the B-Flat that I had been on for a number
of weeks. |
 |
Now, like I stated
before, I can tell how a setup rides pretty much out of
the gate, so I was confident that it would be a quick
test. I got up and did my pre-rip cuts across the
wakes, eventually finding no glitching or hunting at
all. After this, I took the foil out into the
flats and started thinking about doing drift jumps,
cutting as hard as I could into the flats, jumping, and
then sinking the board into the water as hard as I
could. Now, here is where things got interesting.
The first time I cut out, I noticed that the foil was
much easier to take in and out of my cuts. To
translate some, I felt that the wing would not set into
a cut and stay there. I could cut and let off the
line and immediately feel the foil ease off the cut
without me having to kill the banking of the wing.
Once I got the ease of cutting dialed in, I started
doing my drift jumping. So there I went, cutting
across the wakes as hard as I could then popped a big
line-loaded jump. As I exited the water, I felt a
ton of pop and great exit angle from the front wing.
Upon landing, the foil took a totally different approach
to clearing the water. As I landed, I expected the
board to hit as usual and take the 1-2 clearing hits
that it normally does. However, on this particular
jump, I landed and NO delay from the time the board
touched the water till I regained flight. As this
happened, I looked at the boat and shrugged my
shoulders, wondering if he had noticed what I did.
So again, I cut, popped and WHAM, foil cleared up
immediately again. After this, it was apparent
that this was the way the wing acted landing jumps.
I continued riding this wing, doing wake and air jumps
as big as I could, still getting the same reaction after
landings. I was pretty shocked at what was
happening under me, having no board slap after any jump.
Soon after getting done with my jumping, I took the wing
upside down. I didn’t really want to start with little
rolls or front flips, so I took the thing vertical on my
first inverts. Cutting hard across both wakes, I popped
a fairly big air roll, came around, and WHAM, foil
cleared as fast as I landed. I was still in
amazement
after this, so I switched up my landings a bit, trying
to get this thing to stick down or do something funky
like slip-out. The next rolls that I did, I landed with
a really long delay in the time I brought the board
around, and when I did this, I noticed that the wing
wouldn’t have to have the board help it clear the air
off the wing. The wing would land a hair nose heavy,
the wing would clear up and you’d be halfway up the
t-bar. So in conclusion with jumping and flipping, it
doesn’t matter how you land with these wingletless
wings, the board / foil WILL clear up much faster than
with winglets. I'm not going to say every wingletless
wing, but I can say that the 3 I’ve ridden, from 2
different makers, clear up 100% better and faster than
any winglet wing I've ridden in 6 years. My testing
partner jumped on this same setup and enjoyed it even
more than I did. After riding for twice as long as he
has in many months, he got into the boat and said, ‘wow,
unbelievable!’ We also rode the Bat Wingletless wing
and saw many of the same characteristics shown with the
B-Flat, landed awesome and cut great, as well as having
substantial pop and control. For more info on the
characteristics of the Bat Wingletless, contact Ben
Ferney at
ben@airjunky.com |
 |
So someone reading
this might think of what this all means to them. For me
to answer for you would be wrong. All I can say is that
I'm glad for that foggy day in Australia (I don’t know if
it was foggy, but let’s pretend) early this year.
I'm
glad that someone was thinking outside the current ‘box’
that we are foiling in. Not only this, I’m glad that
they spent the time on it to see ALL the angles of what
the wing does without being quick to judge and conclude.
I want to advise people who are after a
smoother cutting and landing machine to find someone
harboring this new design and get some time on it. I
put as many people on it at the event at Cypress
Gardens, and got very good feedback. If you wish to
contact me about these people, or if you are willing to
speak up about your experiences, please do so. As time
rolls on and more people experience what I feel is a
great riding wing for virtually all riding levels, there
will be much more input on this. As with any change
comes drawbacks, and once I find a drawback from this
new ride, Ill be sure to let you know. Until then,
happy flying. |
|
http://www.skyski.com
http://www.cinchmax.com
http://www.dragonoptical.com
http://www.pridehomesinc.com
http://www.h2oclothing.net
http://www.airsling.com |
| |
Upcoming Events |
Riga Fly-In
-- June 2nd - 4th, 2006
-- Ivars Ildens
Riga, Latvia --
www.rigaflyin.lv or
www.udensklubs.lv
Tennessee Fly-In
(7th Annual) -- June
22nd - 26th, 2006 --
Steve McCrary
Byrdstown, Tennessee --
www.tnflyin.com
Pacific Northwest
Fly-In (3rd Annual)
-- July 29th - 30th,
2006 -- Chris Parrish
Lake Mayfield,
Washington --
www.nwflyin.com
Idaho Fly-In
(3rd Annual) -- August
27th - 29th, 2005 --
Tracie Szybuski
Priest Lake, Idaho --
www.elkinsresort.com |
|
|
|
|
| |
The "Flight Log" is compiled and
published by team
Hydrofoil.
www.teamhydrofoil.com
|
| Do you have an idea for an article that might
interest other Hydrofoilers? If so, please submit
it to
cliff@teamhydrofoil.com. Be sure to include
your contact information. The views of the
contributing writers do not necessarily reflect the
views of team
Hydrofoil. team
Hydrofoil does not change or
edit any contributed articles other than correcting
typographical and punctuation errors. team
Hydrofoil does not guarantee
the accuracy or claims of any articles. |

|